<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What story are you telling your donors&#8230; and where are you telling it?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bigducknyc.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bigducknyc.com/blog/?p=999</link>
	<description>Smart communications, brandraising, and good times for nonprofits</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:04:39 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Margolis</title>
		<link>http://www.bigducknyc.com/blog/?p=999&#038;cpage=1#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Margolis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 02:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigducknyc.com/blog/?p=999#comment-864</guid>
		<description>Thomas - I totally agree with your great points. 

So often part of the story disconnect is that nonprofits aren&#039;t telling the right overall story. They&#039;re still framing the issue in terms that are no longer relevant, focused on a sense of urgency, alarm, or moralizing their issue. The real lesson is learning how to find and tell the bigger story - that transcends old boundaries that separate. 

On Dec 8th, I&#039;m leading a free telecall with Network for Good all around this hot topic. http://web.networkforgood.org/np911120809

Hope you and your readers can possibly listen in. If you register, you also get audio and written transcript of the session. All free...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas &#8211; I totally agree with your great points. </p>
<p>So often part of the story disconnect is that nonprofits aren&#8217;t telling the right overall story. They&#8217;re still framing the issue in terms that are no longer relevant, focused on a sense of urgency, alarm, or moralizing their issue. The real lesson is learning how to find and tell the bigger story &#8211; that transcends old boundaries that separate. </p>
<p>On Dec 8th, I&#8217;m leading a free telecall with Network for Good all around this hot topic. <a href="http://web.networkforgood.org/np911120809" rel="nofollow">http://web.networkforgood.org/np911120809</a></p>
<p>Hope you and your readers can possibly listen in. If you register, you also get audio and written transcript of the session. All free&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Negron</title>
		<link>http://www.bigducknyc.com/blog/?p=999&#038;cpage=1#comment-830</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Negron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigducknyc.com/blog/?p=999#comment-830</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the thoughtful comments!
 
@Lon, if I could build on what you&#039;re saying, nonprofits should do research as to what tools their donors are using. It doesn&#039;t have to be a time intensive effort, but asking a few simple questions of several people can make all the difference. Facebook, Twitter, etc. get all the mainstream attention and are often the first tools an org thinks of trying, but there are many smaller sites that are popular based on geography or interest that may be a better channel to communicate with its donors. 

@Phil, it sounds like you may be encountering a situation where management 1) responds to that type of data and assumes others will as well and 2) believes the numbers make an obvious case for why people should make gift. It can be difficult getting someone to be comfortable with the idea that how other people process and respond to the same information may be different. Perhaps you can ease them into it by making a case for experimentation and slowly expanding as success builds. Good luck!

@Kevin, I completely agree! Unifying communications across all departments and stakeholders is the goal and can often be the tougher challenge. Add to that everyone has a different level of comfort with and belief in technology and you start to understand why some orgs may feel overwhelmed at the prospect of starting the work involved. Maybe we should tackle that at an upcoming 501 Tech NYC meeting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the thoughtful comments!</p>
<p>@Lon, if I could build on what you&#8217;re saying, nonprofits should do research as to what tools their donors are using. It doesn&#8217;t have to be a time intensive effort, but asking a few simple questions of several people can make all the difference. Facebook, Twitter, etc. get all the mainstream attention and are often the first tools an org thinks of trying, but there are many smaller sites that are popular based on geography or interest that may be a better channel to communicate with its donors. </p>
<p>@Phil, it sounds like you may be encountering a situation where management 1) responds to that type of data and assumes others will as well and 2) believes the numbers make an obvious case for why people should make gift. It can be difficult getting someone to be comfortable with the idea that how other people process and respond to the same information may be different. Perhaps you can ease them into it by making a case for experimentation and slowly expanding as success builds. Good luck!</p>
<p>@Kevin, I completely agree! Unifying communications across all departments and stakeholders is the goal and can often be the tougher challenge. Add to that everyone has a different level of comfort with and belief in technology and you start to understand why some orgs may feel overwhelmed at the prospect of starting the work involved. Maybe we should tackle that at an upcoming 501 Tech NYC meeting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin B. Gilnack</title>
		<link>http://www.bigducknyc.com/blog/?p=999&#038;cpage=1#comment-826</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin B. Gilnack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigducknyc.com/blog/?p=999#comment-826</guid>
		<description>You make a very crucial point that gets overlooked when nonprofits start diving into new communications tools.  Too often a nonprofit looks at social media like it&#039;s its own strategy, when really it&#039;s a new tool for moving your story to stakeholders.

The only caveat I might make is that development is work is only one side of the nonprofit business.  You may, in fact, want to reach different audiences with different stories over different channels (or maybe through different accounts on the same channel).  What you say to organize volunteers or an advocacy action might be different than what you tell your high level donors.

Unify your message to donors across different channels: absolutely. But don&#039;t forget to ask volunteer recruiters, advocacy &amp; public policy, HR, and other departments how they think these tools can be used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make a very crucial point that gets overlooked when nonprofits start diving into new communications tools.  Too often a nonprofit looks at social media like it&#8217;s its own strategy, when really it&#8217;s a new tool for moving your story to stakeholders.</p>
<p>The only caveat I might make is that development is work is only one side of the nonprofit business.  You may, in fact, want to reach different audiences with different stories over different channels (or maybe through different accounts on the same channel).  What you say to organize volunteers or an advocacy action might be different than what you tell your high level donors.</p>
<p>Unify your message to donors across different channels: absolutely. But don&#8217;t forget to ask volunteer recruiters, advocacy &amp; public policy, HR, and other departments how they think these tools can be used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Mead</title>
		<link>http://www.bigducknyc.com/blog/?p=999&#038;cpage=1#comment-824</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Mead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigducknyc.com/blog/?p=999#comment-824</guid>
		<description>Absolutely spot on with these comments.  I&#039;ve just started pro bono consulting work for an NPO and the first thing that struck me is their inability to tell their story in simple, emotive, human terms.  They do fantastic work in conflict zones around the world;  unfortunately, the way they convey it is in very high-level, strategic and process-oriented terminology, leaving the potential donor nothing to empathize with at all. There seems to be a delibertate &#039;matter-of-fact&#039; approach (rational mind) at the expense of affective storytelling as if the latter were in contravention of professional principles.  Anyway the voyage of discovery has just begun, so thanks for the timely and relevant post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely spot on with these comments.  I&#8217;ve just started pro bono consulting work for an NPO and the first thing that struck me is their inability to tell their story in simple, emotive, human terms.  They do fantastic work in conflict zones around the world;  unfortunately, the way they convey it is in very high-level, strategic and process-oriented terminology, leaving the potential donor nothing to empathize with at all. There seems to be a delibertate &#8216;matter-of-fact&#8217; approach (rational mind) at the expense of affective storytelling as if the latter were in contravention of professional principles.  Anyway the voyage of discovery has just begun, so thanks for the timely and relevant post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lon S. Cohen</title>
		<link>http://www.bigducknyc.com/blog/?p=999&#038;cpage=1#comment-823</link>
		<dc:creator>Lon S. Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigducknyc.com/blog/?p=999#comment-823</guid>
		<description>Good advice. It&#039;s easy to have the message get fragmented when crossing all the available channels. What a nonprofit needs to do its attack communications from the side of the story first and then adopt tools and channels that best allow them to tell their story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good advice. It&#8217;s easy to have the message get fragmented when crossing all the available channels. What a nonprofit needs to do its attack communications from the side of the story first and then adopt tools and channels that best allow them to tell their story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
